Matt
02-14-2007, 04:20 PM
I posted a similar poll (http://www.pokereagles.com/poker-forum/showthread.php?t=716)a while before the UIGEA passed. Internet games had become harder to beat, probably because good players could make decent money multi-tabling with smaller bankrolls at lower stakes. I didn't notice much difference after Party and other sites stopped doing business with US customers. The fish just moved to other sites and the games got even better.
The Neteller pullout dealt quite a blow to online poker. Some players have complained about the games drying up. I haven't noticed much difference. The games may have become slightly tougher, but I still find many bad players. I see a lot of good players on a regular basis, but it only takes one or two live ones to make a game profitable. All you have to do is make adjustments for the better players (I'll post more about these adjustments in the Limit Hold'em forum).
I suppose a lot depends on the particular games you play. I've found that the full-handed $2/$4 and $3/$6 LHE games on Full Tilt are still beatable if you exercise good game selection. What are your thoughts?
The Neteller pullout dealt quite a blow to online poker. Some players have complained about the games drying up. I haven't noticed much difference. The games may have become slightly tougher, but I still find many bad players. I see a lot of good players on a regular basis, but it only takes one or two live ones to make a game profitable. All you have to do is make adjustments for the better players (I'll post more about these adjustments in the Limit Hold'em forum).
I suppose a lot depends on the particular games you play. I've found that the full-handed $2/$4 and $3/$6 LHE games on Full Tilt are still beatable if you exercise good game selection. What are your thoughts?