<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PokerEagles &#187; News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pokereagles.com/poker-blog/category/news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pokereagles.com/poker-blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 20:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Every Hand Revealed - Gus Hansen</title>
		<link>http://www.pokereagles.com/poker-blog/2008/05/every-hand-revealed-gus-hansen/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pokereagles.com/poker-blog/2008/05/every-hand-revealed-gus-hansen/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 20:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MJPerry</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pokereagles.com/poker-blog/?p=50</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many poker publications advocate a set style of play, which is all well and good for the beginning player. However it seems, especially online, that LAG is the new TAG and as such intermediate-to-advanced players should prepare themselves for these supposed maniacs.


It may be premature to say, but this book looks to be the best [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="left;">Many poker publications advocate a set style of play, which is all well and good for the beginning player. However it seems, especially online, that LAG is the new TAG and as such intermediate-to-advanced players should prepare themselves for these supposed maniacs.</p>
<p style="center;"><img src="http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/41brTTcRy0L._SL500_AA240_.jpg" alt="" width="240" height="240" /></p>
<p style="left;">
<p style="left;">It may be premature to say, but this book looks to be the best book on tournament poker since the <em>Harrington on Hold &#8216;em </em>series. Whilst it certainly won&#8217;t redefine poker in the way the former books did, this is the first book to track a real-life tournament from beginning to end. Quite literally, every hand is revealed. Hansen talks you through his insane style, and you see that Shakespeare had a point when he said that &#8220;though it be madness, there is method in&#8217;t.&#8221;</p>
<p style="left;">Hansen approaches every hand with a cool logic based on pot odds, opponent awareness and, of course, sheer relentless aggression. If you&#8217;re happy with your tight-aggressive style and don&#8217;t want to learn new ways to play, fine. You&#8217;re an idiot, but fine. However, this book will also teach you to play against the Hansens and Iveys of the world.</p>
<p style="left;">Buy it, simple as that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pokereagles.com/poker-blog/2008/05/every-hand-revealed-gus-hansen/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Farha on Omaha</title>
		<link>http://www.pokereagles.com/poker-blog/2008/05/farha-on-omaha/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pokereagles.com/poker-blog/2008/05/farha-on-omaha/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 16:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MJPerry</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pokereagles.com/poker-blog/?p=49</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We all know the game of poker, where you exchange your money for chips; sit down at a table; size up your opponents; put in your blind and get dealt your four hole cards. Yes, four.

Omaha is the new Hold &#8216;em, baby. The action game where the nuts and second nuts square off on a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We all know the game of poker, where you exchange your money for chips; sit down at a table; size up your opponents; put in your blind and get dealt your four hole cards. Yes, four.</p>
<p style="center;"><img src="http://www.triumphbooks.com/filebin/FullSizeF07/Farha%20on%20omaha300px_wi.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="453" /></p>
<p style="left;">Omaha is the new Hold &#8216;em, baby. The action game where the nuts and second nuts square off on a regular basis, and this book is perfect for those players wishing to learn the game that most of the pros favour.</p>
<p style="left;">Covering limit and pot-limit Omaha, high and 8B, cash or tournament, this book has it all. It completely removes any view of Hold &#8216;em as at all similar to Omaha - read this book and you&#8217;re starting from scratch, and you&#8217;ll make a few bucks along the way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pokereagles.com/poker-blog/2008/05/farha-on-omaha/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My first live MTT - Part 4</title>
		<link>http://www.pokereagles.com/poker-blog/2008/02/my-first-live-mtt-part-4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pokereagles.com/poker-blog/2008/02/my-first-live-mtt-part-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 00:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MJPerry</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pokereagles.com/poker-blog/2008/02/my-first-live-mtt-part-4/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The very first hand of our  new full table was an incredible orgy of all-ins. Here’s how it went  down:
I was the big blind and no  sooner had my chip touched the felt than the player next to me announced  he was all-in in the dark. I could see why, as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="3">The very first hand of our  new full table was an incredible orgy of all-ins. Here’s how it went  down:</font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="3">I was the big blind and no  sooner had my chip touched the felt than the player next to me announced  he was all-in in the dark. I could see why, as he moved only t2,750  into the centre of the table. The cards were dealt and the player to  his left called, and after two folds another player moved in over the  top for an additional t5,000. It folded to the small blind who called,  and then the first player moved in for t6,000 more. The small blind  called for most of his chips, and after about four years sorting out  the main and side pots, the hands were shown down:</font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="3">UTG shortstack – 7s-Kd</font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="3">UTG+1 – Ah-Qh</font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="3">MP – Jc-Jd</font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="3">SB – As-Kc</font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="3">Stack sizes meant that only  the SB could scoop the lot, and he did it in style when the flop fell  Js-Qs-Ts, with the nuts and a nut flush draw. There were splits and  redraws possible though, and I heard him breathe an audible sigh of  relief when the turn and river both blanked. He took the pot of around  t18,000, giving him a stack of t25,000 and reducing the field to 16. </font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="3">Sadly for me his chip increase  turned out to be my demise. </font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="3">Six-handed and with 12 players  left it folded to him in the small blind. With blinds of 800/1,600 he  made it t4,000 to go. I looked down at 5d-4d and decided to repop him  and steal the pot. I made it t12,000 and was playing about t25,000 behind.  Unfortunately he called.</font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="3">Fortunately the flop was 5h-4d-8s. </font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="3">I bet t10,000 into the t24,000  pot, intending to call a shove or shove any turn. He simply called,  and the turn revealed the 9h. Unless he was playing 9-8 or something  that was a good card for me and I went all in for t15,000 more. I think  the exact amount was closer to t16,500 but that will suffice. </font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="3">He was getting slightly less  than 3-1 on his money and it was blind vs. blind so I think his call  with Ah-8h was fairly reasonable. He had top pair and the nut flush  draw, and in addition any 9 counterfeited my flopped two pair. All I  had to do was dodge a heart and I would be the chip leader of the table. </font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="3">The river fell… Kh. </font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="3">I tried not to feel too dejected  as I had only lost a relatively small sum of money and gone deep. Replaying  over the final hand it seems I should have let him pick up the blinds,  but I (correctly) put him on a marginal hand. If I were him I would  have folded that to my re-raise pre-flop, especially out of position  and when my stack rivalled his own. On the flop he had top-top and wasn’t  going to put me on 44, 55, 88, 76 or some other combination that beat  him so I think his call was justified, if a little passive. If he thought  he was beat I prefer a shove there, but hey, what do I know? I came  12/52! </font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="3">Overall it was a very fun night  out for me and I’ll be back again. This time hopefully my opponent  won’t hit their 2-1 shot and I can go on to take it down. </font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pokereagles.com/poker-blog/2008/02/my-first-live-mtt-part-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My first live MTT - Part 3</title>
		<link>http://www.pokereagles.com/poker-blog/2008/02/my-first-live-mtt-part-3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pokereagles.com/poker-blog/2008/02/my-first-live-mtt-part-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 11:20:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MJPerry</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pokereagles.com/poker-blog/2008/02/my-first-live-mtt-part-3/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My new table seemed to be delivering me absolutely perfect hole cards – for Razz. Completely dead for two entire orbits, I received one walk in the big blind but this table were savvy and would not let me steal. With my stack whittled down to t11,000 at the 500/1000 level one fairly tight player [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman">My new table seemed to be delivering me absolutely perfect hole cards – for Razz. Completely dead for two entire orbits, I received one walk in the big blind but this table were savvy and would not let me steal. With my stack whittled down to t11,000 at the 500/1000 level one fairly tight player called a raise to 3,000 by a loose-aggressive player. I wasn’t “in position” so they wouldn’t put me on a steal but I “had” position on them so decided to attempt a squeeze with any suited connectors &gt;89 or any ace. There was t7,500 in the pot and I was risking t11,000 to win it. The loose player would probably fold to an all-in with a player to act behind him and the original raiser was usually playing “raise or fold” poker so I deduced he had a slightly weak holding. I had Js-Ts and made the move. </font></p>
<p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman">The blinds folded. Good, that’s t1,500 locked up.</font></p>
<p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman">The loose raiser folded. Excellent.</font></p>
<p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman">The tight player looked at me (foldfoldfoldfoldfold) and looked at his cards (foldfoldfoldfoldfold). He looked at me again (foldfoldfoldfoldfold) and counted out the chips he’d need to put in (foldfoldfoldfoldfold). It was a hefty chunk of his stack but not enough to cripple him (foldfoldfoldfoldfold) and he looked at me again. </font></p>
<p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman">“I think I’ve got you,” he said. I was a statue, just staring at the table. Then I heard that awful word “I call.”</font></p>
<p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman">I showed my hand and he smiled grimly, tabling 77. It was a great call by him but I still stand by my play. At this point I had invested t11,000 in the pot and stood to win over three times that. He had the 7s and now PokerStove tells me it was actually as big a coinflip as you can get – I was 50.578% to win. Therefore I was even money getting 3-1 odds, making a far better play than I thought! It was still a great call by him – I read him right for his hand and he read me right for mine. </font></p>
<p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman">The flop was horrendous, throwing out a board of 7d-9c-2h. The turn was an equally sickening 3h and I stood up to leave before my opponent’s cry of dismay sat me back down as the dealer become my saviour on the 8h river. Luckbox? Moi? </font></p>
<p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman">I was showered with chips and glares, and my t31,500 stack was looking nice even when we moved to 600/1,200. The tables broke again soon after as the shorties fell like lemmings, and we were now down to two tables of nine. </font></p>
<p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman">Do I make the final table or do I crash and burn?</font></p>
<p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman">Find out tomorrow.</font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pokereagles.com/poker-blog/2008/02/my-first-live-mtt-part-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My first live MTT - Part 2</title>
		<link>http://www.pokereagles.com/poker-blog/2008/02/my-first-live-mtt-part-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pokereagles.com/poker-blog/2008/02/my-first-live-mtt-part-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 09:46:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MJPerry</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pokereagles.com/poker-blog/2008/02/my-first-live-mtt-part-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At the 150/300 level play seemed to have loosened up a bit. No one at my table was in any imminent danger, with the shortest stack at t3,000 or so. I include the next hand only for comic relief – I had no part in it and folded some trash in early position. 
After my [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman">At the 150/300 level play seemed to have loosened up a bit. No one at my table was in any imminent danger, with the shortest stack at t3,000 or so. I include the next hand only for comic relief – I had no part in it and folded some trash in early position. </font></p>
<p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman">After my fold the man who seemed like the most solid player raised to t1,000 from his stack of t7,500 or so. The clueless lady mentioned heavily in Part 1 called him and the small blind went all in for t4,000. The initial raiser called quite quickly and then clueless lady seemed to agonise over her decision. I actually have her on tape saying: “But that’s all my money… if I lose I might go out… this is tough, I have a really really good hand…” At this point you’d be forgiven for putting her on something like JJ or AK, but then she says: “OK, I’m going to call.” She has about t5,000 so it’s near enough her whole stack, but as she flat called all the money goes into the small blind’s side pot. </font></p>
<p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman">The solid player announces a bet of t1,000 in the dark, and after I explain to the newbie what that means she calls.</font></p>
<p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman">They turn up the hands.</font></p>
<p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman">The small blind has two black nines, a reasonable holding for what was essentially a squeeze play from a shortstack. Unfortunately the solid player with AA was never going to fold, and neither was the novice woman with her powerhouse… Qh 8h!</font></p>
<p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman">It would be a lovely ending to this anecdote to tell you that the flop ran out with three low hearts, but unfortunately the player with the bullets made aces up and the turn and river couldn’t bring a nine. The AA-holding player scooped a massive pot, now holding twice the chips of anyone at the table and eliminating two players, including one who was incredibly entertaining. At this point it was announced we were to have a quick break for a colour-up and breaking some tables.</font></p>
<p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman">I was told I’d be moving to a totally new table, and upon sitting down I had mixed feelings. All the players had massive stacks, which was both good and bad news for me – juicy implied odds if I was the best player there, but with seven big stacks there I had to give some of them credit for being decent players. Totally card-dead, I watched the play for a while and deduced there were some good players and some donkeys. </font></p>
<p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman">Quicker than I thought the blinds reached 300/600, and with my stack at t6,300 I wasn’t too happy with that. No sooner had I posted my small blind than I had the opportunity to double up, however. The donkey under the gun raised to t1,200 and received two callers when it limp/folded back to me with QQ. I had two options – I could move in now, which would be reasonable bet size and probably win me a good sized pot. Or I could flat call and move in on any flop. I favoured the former, as a flop with overcards or straight/flush combinations would be worrisome for a single pair. Surprisingly my caller was the big blind and everyone else folded. The pot was t16,200 and mine for the taking as the big blind showed TT. I was very very aware of cold decks and his 18% chance of knocking me out, but the flop of QQ2 lessened his chances somewhat! I scooped a massive pot and the table congratulated me warmly, as though making quads was a deliberate and skilled move on my part. I wasn’t complaining though.</font></p>
<p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman">They say lightening doesn’t strike twice, but apparently this deck of cards had never heard that saying, as in the next four hands I was dealt AK twice, AA once and JJ once. Here’s how they went down:</font></p>
<p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"><strong>AK</strong> – it folded to me on the button, I raised to t2,000 and both blinds folded. </font></p>
<p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"><strong>AA</strong> – it folded to me on the cutoff, I raised to t2,000 and the button and both blinds folded. </font></p>
<p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"><strong>JJ</strong> – it limped (yay! Money!) to me and I raised to t3,000. The button called and both limpers folded. The flop was a good 5-4-8 rainbow and I bet t5,000. The button smooth called and the turn bought a beautiful J. It made two hearts and slowplaying didn’t cross my mind. With t10,000 or so left in my stack and a t17,000 pot I moved in and he folded. </font></p>
<p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"><strong>AK – </strong>it folded to me and I raised to t2,000. Evidently the table had had enough of me and the small blind re-raised to t6,000. The big blind came over the top of him for all his chips and the small blind insta-called out of turn and turned up QQ. I laughed and folded face-up, and the big blind showed JJ. He spiked a jack on the turn and eliminated the over-eager bettor. </font></p>
<p><font size="3" face="Times New Roman">The tables broke again and blinds were 400/800 as I was moved once more. I spotted the solid player from my first table but didn’t recognise anyone else. This particular table was 7-handed. My stack was t25,000 give or take a few hundred and according to the whiteboard the chip leader had t40,800. I was the biggest stack on my table with 22 runners left. Only the top six got paid but everyone at the final table received a free drink and a packet of peanuts. Consolation indeed for the bubble.</font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pokereagles.com/poker-blog/2008/02/my-first-live-mtt-part-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My First Live MTT – Part 1</title>
		<link>http://www.pokereagles.com/poker-blog/2008/02/my-first-live-mtt-%e2%80%93-part-1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pokereagles.com/poker-blog/2008/02/my-first-live-mtt-%e2%80%93-part-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 13:25:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MJPerry</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pokereagles.com/poker-blog/2008/02/my-first-live-mtt-%e2%80%93-part-1/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last Wednesday, after dutifully writing my blog for PokerEagles, I played my first ever live tournament (discounting home games). So this blog will be a multi-part special (how many parts depend on how deep I go, I’m writing this introduction on the afternoon of  the 29th Jan) – a review of my first live tourney.
I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last Wednesday, after dutifully writing my blog for PokerEagles, I played my first ever live tournament (discounting home games). So this blog will be a multi-part special (how many parts depend on how deep I go, I’m writing this introduction on the afternoon of  the 29<sup>th</sup> Jan) – a review of my first live tourney.</p>
<p>I heard about it via the excellent website of the LPM (London Poker Meetup) group who organise and attend games across this fine city. The largest of its kind outside the USA, the LPM comprises over one thousand poker players, all up for a game.</p>
<p>The game was an £11 ($22) buy-in at a pub about forty minutes away from me. The TD told me they usually got 50 or so runners with a £200 ($400) first prize. The starting stack was t4,500 but if you showed up early to pay in person you got an extra t500 – I assume that was incentive to get people to turn up on time. I obviously decided to attempt to do so and got to the venue around half an hour before the tournament was due to start at 8pm.</p>
<p>The actual pub itself was a nice place, and when I arrived there were already at least two dozen people there. More showed up through the next twenty minutes and the TD ( a nice bloke by the name of Steve) announced that we would begin with 54 runners, perfect for six tables of nine players. Despite the low buy-in there were a few people at my table who seemed to know what they were doing judging by the way they handled their chips, and some seemed very watchful of the other players, as I resolved to be. Regrettably not all the details of this tournament are available to me: I took a Dictaphone along, thus convincing the other players I was absolutely mental by muttering constantly into my inside pocket, but some background noise obscured my recording at some points. The account of the tournament that follows is as accurate as it can be.</p>
<p>During the initial deal for the button I received the 2c and got the big blind for the first hand. Our table seemed to be fully stacked, but it was hard to tell with only one chip difference between the t4,500 and the full amount. I spent most of the first blind level checking out the quality of the opposition. It seemed that out of the eight other players there were three decent ones, two maniacs, two stations and one lady who had no idea what she was doing and had to be prompted before each action. I received a walk on both my big blinds and we started the second level with the same table and myself with the same stack. There had been no pots over t1,000 and our table dynamics were essentially the same.</p>
<p>I was under the gun in the first hand of the 50/100 level and I picked up KK. With two maniacs to my left I elected to simply limp in, and received one caller before the first lunatic made it t600 to go, causing the second to fold. The clueless lady called on the button and the blinds folded. Back to me with a pot of t1,350 and I decided to simply drop the hammer and move all in. Any pot-sized raise was half my stack and I knew the two loose players would call anything besides an all in, and I couldn’t give them a chance to catch with ace-rag or some other crap. I shoved and they both folded, leaving me with a stack of t6,250.</p>
<p>Shortly after the TD announced blinds would increase to 150/200 next hand I found myself with my first difficult decision of the day after being totally card-dead all evening since the KK hand. I was in the cutoff when the loose player made it t500 as per usual. He was called by a reasonable player and the clueless woman but then another decent player re-raised to t2,000 from his stack of around t4,000. I had around t6,000 and found As-Ks. I knew I could beat the two loose donkeys and that the first decent player would likely fold to an all-in if I chose to do so, but the second raiser had me worried. He’d been playing fairly tight all night, and I decided I had to give him credit for at least a medium-high pocket pair – I laid it down. The loose donkey surprisingly went all in for about t1,000 more and the other two folded. The re-raiser insta-called and showed, to my dismay, Ah-Qs. Fortunately the loose player had managed to be dealt KK. I had a scary moment of regret when the flop was 2s-4s-Jc, but the turn of 5c and river of 3d took out the donkey. I would have split a pot of around t4,500 on that hand but I’m still happy with my fold. I would have been a 3.5-1 dog if I had made the call.</p>
<p>Now we were playing eight-handed, and the whiteboard the TD had set up showed us that there were 47 players left across the six tables. With blinds at 150/300 we had been playing for a little over an hour, and I was nursing a healthy stack of t5,700 or so. The chip leader was on another table but it was said he had around 25,000 already due to some very lucky hands.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pokereagles.com/poker-blog/2008/02/my-first-live-mtt-%e2%80%93-part-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who wants a game of Jacks&#8217;n'Fives Eastenders?</title>
		<link>http://www.pokereagles.com/poker-blog/2008/01/hey-everyone-who-wants-a-game-of-jacksnfives-eastenders/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pokereagles.com/poker-blog/2008/01/hey-everyone-who-wants-a-game-of-jacksnfives-eastenders/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 15:49:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MJPerry</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pokereagles.com/poker-blog/2008/01/hey-everyone-who-wants-a-game-of-jacksnfives-eastenders/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Firstly I’d like to welcome the people who will (hopefully) be my loyal readers throughout my time here at PokerEagles. If you’re reading this after a Google search or some such that led you straight to this page I strongly encourage you to sign up to the forums here and peruse the tons of other [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Firstly I’d like to welcome the people who will (hopefully) be my loyal readers throughout my time here at PokerEagles. If you’re reading this after a Google search or some such that led you straight to this page I strongly encourage you to sign up to the forums here and peruse the tons of other articles and information on this site.</p>
<p>This blog will run a minimum of once a week every Wednesday, with another post from my esteemed colleague on Saturdays. I’ll be discussing poker events, poker strategy and reviews of poker books, websites and everything else under this gambling sun.</p>
<p>This week’s post is about broadening your horizons (and I apologise for my extended solar metaphor) with regards to your poker playing. I’d say it’s a fairly safe guess to assume the majority of the people on this website play NLHE almost exclusively, however this is definitely a mistake. Even if you’re a NLHE God then to deny yourself the experience of other poker games is idiotic. Limit Hold ‘em might be boring for a no limit player but it will teach you the intricacies of post-flop play better than NL ever can. Omaha will teach you the value of pot control and playing the nuts, and Stud the ability to read your opponents hand and gaining free cards. Even Razz, a game considered a joke by a lot of players, is a valuable tool in a player’s arsenal – and it’s fun too. Stud, Draw, Chicago, Pineapple, Irish… there are so many forms of poker out there for you to play that you’re making a mistake to restrict yourself to one.</p>
<p>PokerEagles has forums for all kinds of poker, and while at the moment they’re not the busiest, soon they will be, what with all the work Nima is putting in to this site. So stick around, sign up for the RSS Feed, join the forums – and leave that hold ‘em table.</p>
<p>FYI - Jn5EE is five-card draw where Jacks and Fives are wild and there are rounds of betting after the draw where players show down their cards one at a time and bet on each one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pokereagles.com/poker-blog/2008/01/hey-everyone-who-wants-a-game-of-jacksnfives-eastenders/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Poker Ace &#038; Windows Vista</title>
		<link>http://www.pokereagles.com/poker-blog/2008/01/poker-ace-windows-vista/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pokereagles.com/poker-blog/2008/01/poker-ace-windows-vista/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 16:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pokereagles.com/poker-blog/2008/01/poker-ace-windows-vista/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I recently bought a new laptop and it has Vista installed on it. I play my online poker games mostly on the laptop and Poker Ace has been giving me problems. There are actually two problems that I&#8217;ve encountered so far playing on FullTiltPoker:

Sometimes PokerAce doesn&#8217;t put the stats on  the table. It shows up [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently bought a new laptop and it has Vista installed on it. I play my online poker games mostly on the laptop and <strong><a href="http://pokeracesoftware.com/" title="Poker Ace" target="_blank">Poker Ace</a></strong> has been giving me problems. There are actually two problems that I&#8217;ve encountered so far playing on <strong><a href="http://www.fulltiltpoker.com/?key=MDAwMDY0ODcwMDAwRjkwQTAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDA" target="_blank">FullTiltPoker</a></strong>:</p>
<ol>
<li>Sometimes PokerAce doesn&#8217;t put the stats on  the table. It shows up as very small numbers somewhere else on my monitor and is not readable at all. I tried closing and re-opening the software but didn&#8217;t work.</li>
<li>Also, when choosing flicker free drawing, you can not click on the stats anymore (on the FullTiltPoker table).</li>
</ol>
<p><strong>PokerAce</strong> has  instructions on their website for <strong><a href="http://pokeracesoftware.com/hud/support.php?section=prb-vista" target="_blank">Vista problems</a></strong>. They say you need to run the software as an administrator (right click, choose properties, and choose &#8220;run as administrator&#8221;. I did that and it didn&#8217;t fix my problem. Actually after I did that, PokerAce didn&#8217;t even recognize my FTP tables. Apparently PokerAce has problem working with FTP in <strong><a href="http://www.microsoft.com/windows/products/windowsvista/default.mspx" target="_blank">windows Vista</a></strong>.</p>
<p><a href="http://pokeracesoftware.com/" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.pokereagles.com/poker-blog/wp-content/uploads/poker-ace.gif" alt="Poker Ace Software" /></a></p>
<p>Finally, this is how I fixed my problem: PokerAce - currently - has two versions; a <strong><a href="http://pokeracesoftware.com/hud/download.php" target="_blank">stable version and a beta version</a></strong>. I was running the stable version. But once I upgraded to the beta version, my problems were fixed and I actually didn&#8217;t have to run the software as an administrator.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pokereagles.com/poker-blog/2008/01/poker-ace-windows-vista/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Purdue Vs. Central Michigan In Motor City Bowl</title>
		<link>http://www.pokereagles.com/poker-blog/2007/12/purdue-vs-central-michigan-in-motor-city-bowl/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pokereagles.com/poker-blog/2007/12/purdue-vs-central-michigan-in-motor-city-bowl/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 23:40:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pokereagles.com/poker-blog/2007/12/purdue-vs-central-michigan-in-motor-city-bowl/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tonight&#8217;s game is Purdue vs. Central Michigan in Motor City Bowl.
The line is -7.5 favoring Purdue. That is what I&#8217;m going for too.
Go Boiler Makers for -7.5.
 
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tonight&#8217;s game is <strong><a href="http://www.purdue.edu" target="_blank">Purdue</a> </strong>vs. <a href="http://www.cmich.edu/" target="_blank"><strong>Central Michigan</strong></a> in Motor City Bowl.<br />
The line is -7.5 favoring Purdue. That is what I&#8217;m going for too.</p>
<p>Go Boiler Makers for -7.5.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.pokereagles.com/poker-blog/wp-content/uploads/purdue.jpg" alt="Purdue Football" /> <img src="http://www.pokereagles.com/poker-blog/wp-content/uploads/central-michigan.jpg" alt="Central Michigan Football" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pokereagles.com/poker-blog/2007/12/purdue-vs-central-michigan-in-motor-city-bowl/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Absolute Poker Cheatings</title>
		<link>http://www.pokereagles.com/poker-blog/2007/10/absolute-poker-cheatings/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pokereagles.com/poker-blog/2007/10/absolute-poker-cheatings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 22:28:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pokereagles.com/poker-blog/2007/10/absolute-poker-cheatings/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m sure by now most of you have heard about the former employee of Absolute Poker who has been cheating at the games by knowing other players hole cards&#8230;
Here is a video from YouTube.

As how much truth there is to this video, I&#8217;m not sure, but about Absolute Poker software being hacked and abused, well, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure by now most of you have heard about the former employee of Absolute Poker who has been cheating at the games by knowing other players hole cards&#8230;</p>
<p>Here is a video from <strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FczbS7FiWSM" target="_blank">YouTube</a></strong>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.pokereagles.com/poker-blog/wp-content/uploads/absolutepokerdotcom.jpg" title="Absolute Poker Cheat"><img src="http://www.pokereagles.com/poker-blog/wp-content/uploads/absolutepokerdotcom.jpg" alt="Absolute Poker Cheat" /></a></p>
<p>As how much truth there is to this video, I&#8217;m not sure, but about Absolute Poker software being hacked and abused, well, that is a fact now. Here are some links:- <strong><a href="http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showflat.php?Cat=0&amp;Number=12523924&amp;page=0&amp;fpart=1&amp;vc=1" target="_blank">2+2 Forum Thread</a></strong></p>
<p>- <strong><a href="http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/10/17/the-absolute-poker-cheating-scandal-blown-wide-open/" target="_blank">New York Times Article </a></strong></p>
<p>It seems like the cheater/s were mostly playing the high limit NL games, but I can swear there were incidents in 30/60 games that i was playing that it was absolutely impossible for someone to make the plays they were making given the high stakes and more importantly their hole cards.</p>
<p>I think this has ruined Absolute Poker reputation and in general online poker reputation. But now, with Bodog in domain troubles, and AP in cheating troubles, FullTiltPoker and PokerStars are going to see more traffic. Hopefully they are not running any sort of scam, but I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if they were.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pokereagles.com/poker-blog/2007/10/absolute-poker-cheatings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
